The Big Decision: Sealed Paper vs Electronic BiddingPosted: 20/06/2016 in Charity Auctions
One initial aspect to bear in mind is time. There are few events where a tight timings schedule isn't adhered to. You know the situation... main courses have just been cleared and somehow we're running 30 minutes late. Paper bidding great as it lends itself beautifully to this concern. A guest simply making his or her maximum bid in a booklet and that is it for the evening. Contrast this with electronic bidding and the guest frequently has to check whether he or she is still in the highest bidder, and if not, whether to continue bidding. This can obviously lend itself to an exciting final 10 minutes, with frantic last minute bids occurring, but, it can often lead to frustration with guests believing they were the winning bidder only to be pipped at the post. Believe me I have been at the end of the disgruntled bidder's wrath! It is also of little use to the guest who has needed to depart early to make the last train back or those conscious of the important meeting the following morning. Electronic bidding requires a significant amount of screen time, often limited in availability, and can serve as a distraction to the many other important aspects of the event.
Logistically though, electronic bidding makes a lot of sense when it comes to larger guests numbers, especially if you are planning to accommodate over 1,000 people at the Grosvenor House Hotel. Keeping a track of winning bidders and collecting the vast number of bidding sheets is a headache from a management side. The bright lights of the tablets keep attention to the silent auction running throughout the night and have pop up displays of new bids received.
Following on from the previous point, larger guest numbers are generally imperative for electronic bidding to achieve the desired level of bidding activity. For all the items to bring significant charity profit it requires at least two very keen individuals to develop a bidding war. This is also great for people that like to draw attention and have some fun but in reality occurs less often than believed or desired. A key positive of sealed paper bidding is that is only takes one bid for an item to sell with a huge charity profit as any other bids are a mystery. The only problem that can occur is where a bidder places 5 or 6 bids but may only be interested in maybe 3 items but this is a very infrequent occurrence.
Despite raising money for charity it's not hard to come across the odd guest who's out for a deal. Naturally, cheeky low bids occur in paper sealed bidding but guests naturally assume that most items have received several bids. When confronted with tablets, there's always temptation for a guest to wait right until the end if there has been no previous interest. The result being that an item in the auction sells but leaving little charity benefit.
and outlays are important to the organiser of any fundraising event. Electronic bidding inevitably costs more, meaning that the silent auction items need to attract more bidding as a whole. Another key element here is risk. At Superstars, although we can offer a subsidised electronic bidding service there is normally some cost involved, and it will never be risk free when compared to our sealed paper bidding service.
Both styles of bidding carry their pros and cons and it is important to really think about what is best, on a case by case basis. If you are holding a huge annual fundraiser the glitzy iPads may well be the answer. However, unless your event is full to the brim with very high net worth individuals, sealed paper bidding is probably the way to go. In essence, sealed bidding takes fewer people to have a larger impact, when it comes to charity profit, and unless the event is seriously well established, seriously reduces potential risk.